Open Innovation AI · Procurement Review

Executive Media Training — Two Proposals, Side by Side

Bilingual (Arabic + English) half-day media training for two co-founders, delivered at the OIAI office in Abu Dhabi. Comparison of the Insight Action response to OIAI's RFP against the MSL program proposal.

Scope: 2 execs · ~3.5 hrs · bilingual · on-camera RFP ref: OIAI-RFP-MT-2026-07 Prepared: Aug 2026
Bottom line

Insight is the stronger, lower-risk proposal — and still roughly half the price after MSL's discount.

Insight completed OIAI's own response template line by line: named bilingual trainers with bios, a broadcast camera operator, three client references, per-executive recorded playback and written PDF feedback, all for $4,568 incl. VAT. Even at MSL's reduced $8,000 (excl. VAT), MSL costs ~75% more while leaving the trainers unnamed, offering no references, and not committing in writing to recordings handover or individual written feedback. MSL's edges — a baseline "surprise interview," a detailed timed agenda, and included catering — are worth capturing, but as negotiating points, not reasons to pay the premium.

Price

What each one costs

Insight Action Marketing

Responded on OIAI's RFP template · valid 90 days

$4,568 incl. VAT

$4,350.85 excl. VAT + 5% VAT ($217.55). Venue & refreshments paid by client.

MSL

Program proposal (deck) · June 2026

$14,680$8,000 excl. VAT

Originally $14,680. VAT additional. Includes catering/lunch; venue by OIAI.

↓ Reduced from $14,680 to $8,000

Like-for-like, once VAT is added to MSL (~$8,400 incl. 5%), Insight is about $3,800 cheaper — a ~45% lower total for a scope that is equal or broader.

Detail

Deliverable-by-deliverable comparison

Rows follow the deliverables OIAI defined in its own RFP response template (D1–D8), plus the extras each vendor added.

Requirement Insight — $4,568 incl. VAT MSL — $8,000 excl. VAT
Format & duration ✓ Match3.5 hrs, half-day, at OIAI Abu Dhabi office ✓ Match~3.5 hrs contact (10:30–14:00), half-day at OIAI office
Bilingual delivery (AR + EN) ✓ YesDedicated native expert per language; practice run in both ✓ YesBilingual instruction; practice interviews in both languages
Named trainers + bios ✓ Named nowOliver Blofeld (EN, ex-BBC/CNBC/FT) & Nabila Rahhal (AR, ex-LinkedIn MENA). Full bios included. ✗ TBC"Senior media training team" — facilitators unnamed, depend on availability; bios only after confirmation
Camera operator + equipment ✓ YesProfessional broadcast camera + operator; full kit, laptop playback ✓ YesCameraman + filming equipment included
Recordings handed over ✓ Yesmp4 recordings delivered per executive ~ Not statedRecorded playback in-session; handover format not committed
Written feedback per exec ✓ YesIndividual PDF critique + next steps per executive ✗ Not offeredIn-session verbal feedback only; no written per-exec critique named
Tailored scenarios / materials ✓ YesScenarios built with OIAI comms team on key messages; workbooks + presentation ✓ YesSession materials; flip charts + post-its. Less explicit on OIAI-message tailoring
Client references ✓ 3 namedEY MENA, Miral Group, Falcon & Associates (contacts given) ✗ NoneNo references or case studies provided
Baseline assessment ✗ Not offeredGoes straight into theory then practice ✓ Yes"Surprise" recorded interview up front as a baseline before teaching
Detailed timed agenda ~ On confirmationSyllabus given; detailed day agenda provided ahead of training ✓ YesFull minute-by-minute agenda in the proposal
Catering / venue ✗ Client paysVenue & refreshments arranged and paid by OIAI ~ PartialRefreshments/lunch included; venue still by OIAI
Responded on OIAI's template ✓ FullyCompleted the applicant response template + deliverables checklist ✗ NoSubmitted own branded deck; not mapped to the RFP fields

Strengths & gaps

Where each one wins and where it's thin

Insight Action

$4,568 incl. VAT

  • +
    Named, credentialed trainers — a tier-1 ex-broadcast journalist for EN and an ex-LinkedIn MENA editor for AR, with bios in hand.
  • +
    Complete deliverables — mp4 recordings and an individual written PDF critique per executive.
  • +
    Three verifiable references (EY MENA, Miral, Falcon).
  • +
    Answered the RFP as asked — easiest to evaluate and hold to account.
  • +
    Less than half the cost.
  • No structured baseline assessment; no included catering.
  • Smaller, specialist firm rather than a global network name.

MSL

$8,000 excl. VAT (down from $14,680)

  • +
    Global agency brand (Publicis network) — reassurance and potential for a wider PR relationship.
  • +
    Baseline "surprise interview" — a genuinely good pedagogical opener.
  • +
    Detailed minute-by-minute agenda and included refreshments/lunch.
  • Trainers unnamed and unconfirmed — "depend on team availability," bios only later. You're buying the logo, not a known coach.
  • No references or case studies.
  • No committed recordings handover and no per-exec written feedback.
  • ~75% more expensive for equal-or-narrower committed scope.

Recommendation

Best approach

Award to Insight — but fold in MSL's two good ideas.

On a pure procurement read, Insight is the clear pick: it meets every deliverable OIAI defined, names its people, backs itself with references, and does it for under half the price. MSL's discount to $8,000 narrows the gap but doesn't close the substance gap — you'd still be paying a premium for a team you can't yet name and deliverables (recordings, written feedback) it hasn't committed to.

The strongest move is to proceed with Insight and ask them to adopt the two things MSL does better: a recorded "cold-open" baseline interview before teaching, and a tightly timed agenda shared in advance. Both are low-cost asks that make an already-strong offer complete.

Choose Insight if…

The priority is training quality, named expertise, tangible take-home deliverables, and budget discipline. This is the default recommendation.

Choose MSL only if…

OIAI specifically wants to open or deepen a broader PR/comms relationship with a global network, and can accept unnamed trainers plus a further $3,800 in cost — ideally after they close the deliverable gaps.